Pedro Martinez Portero vs Daniel Elahi Galan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W L W L L
Form
L W W L L W W L W LH2H: Portero 1 - 1 Galan
They have played 5 sets in total, with Portero winning 3 and Galan winning 2. The last match between Portero and Galan was at the Valencia Challenger, 12-10-2024, Semifinals, Clay with Pedro Martinez Portero getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pedro Martinez Portero | 1 |
| Daniel Elahi Galan | 1 |
Valencia Challenger(12-10-2024)
| Portero | Stats | Galan |
|---|---|---|
| 42% (10-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 66% (21-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 48 | Ranking | 115 |
| 36 | Highest Rank | 56 |
| 27 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 16 | Titles | 10 |
| 60% (453-299) | Career Total W/L | 55% (408-329) |
| $2,457,065 | Career Prize Money | $1,547,665 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dzumhur VS Bellucci PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Pegula VS Lys PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| 5-7 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
59%
(
59 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 25 | Games Won | 25 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:27:56 | Average Match Time | 2:27:56 |
| 68% (121/177) | 1st Serve % | 63% (109/173) |
| 64% (77/121) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (70/109) |
| 57% (32/56) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (34/64) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (5/25) |
| 40% (69/173) | Return Points Win % | 38% (68/177) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Pedro Martinez Portero Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
16
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Brandon Nakashima
68%
(
79 of
117)
1st Serve %
63%
(
72 of
114)
2
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
48 of
72)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
45 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
114)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
59%
(
67 of
113)
1st Serve %
71%
(
94 of
132)
10
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
57 of
94)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
132)
126
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
77
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
22 of
32)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
45
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Stan Wawrinka
80%
(
80 of
100)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
97%
(
30 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Elahi Galan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
58%
(
56 of
96)
1st Serve %
76%
(
68 of
89)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
75%
(
75 of
100)
1st Serve %
75%
(
76 of
101)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
34 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Jacob Fearnley
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
21 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Remy Bertola
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
37%
(
17 of
46)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (453/299) | Win/Loss | 55% (408/329) |
| 57% (1011/749) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (953/806) |
| 53% (8699/7727) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8745/8194) |
| 50% (69/68) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (106/99) |
| 65% (360/197) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (288/203) |
| 45% (20/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 15% (3/17) |
| 29% (4/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 52% (11/10) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 1075 | Aces Total | 3192 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 2514 | Total Double Faults | 1189 |
| 1:38:13 | Average Match Time | 1:31:5 |
| 411.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 420.54 |
| 66% (30953/47218) | 1st Serve % | 62% (29805/47964) |
| 65% (20180/30953) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (20769/29805) |
| 48% (7877/16269) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (9218/18157) |
| 44% (2361/5351) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1802/4339) |
| 43% (20194/47504) | Return Points Win % | 39% (18317/47314) |
| 55% (32/26) | Slam W/L | 54% (32/27) |
| 33% (16/32) | Masters W/L | 32% (9/19) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 64% (9/5) |
| 50% (73/73) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (57/65) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (144/95) | Challenger W/L | 56% (216/168) |
| 72% (187/71) | Futures W/L | 66% (84/44) |
| 61% (428/704) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (390/702) |
| 44% (14/32) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (15/30) |
| 55% (112/205) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (141/255) |
| 56% (127/225) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (123/245) |
| 87% (438/381) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (415/348) |
| 13% (438/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (415/67) |
| 22% (314/69) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (322/60) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
